Movies You're Excited About
#406
Posted 24 August 2010 - 02:38 PM
take a guess who he is gana be =]
#407
Posted 26 August 2010 - 10:43 AM
JKR666, on 22 August 2010 - 11:58 AM, said:
#408
Posted 26 August 2010 - 01:34 PM
#409
Posted 26 August 2010 - 03:51 PM
its a whole new generation , man these kids dont like brawn and fist fights by bodybuilder types or even athletic types , just look at the films we have been forced to endure (every action flick where the male is NOT UP TO stallone/willis/arnold/Keifer sutherland bodyforms)
remember , this is a world now where we have shiney vampires who cant even get their cock hard, where hollywood is raping the classics and devaluing our cinematic culture ...dont expect anything to be realistic , cus i have yet to see a vegan who is as healthy as that guy *seriosly they are all cardbord thin, for fucks sake*
JKR666, on 26 August 2010 - 09:34 AM, said:
#410
Posted 26 August 2010 - 05:19 PM
I agree though, movies are rapidly degrading into something very ugly, but that's because the industry is rapidly losing money. Hell they're milking Avatar again as if it didn't make enough money the first time around. As for Batman, it's not just movies. It's redefined games (with Arkam Asylum), TV (Batman), and cartoons (Batman Animated). It's the single successful brand in the last twenty years. It's also the one brand that's been milked to death. In movies, cartoons, games, etc.. you'd think the well was dry but they still keep milkin' it away... and I can't for the life of me understand why the media isn't sick of Batman by now.
#412
Posted 27 August 2010 - 03:24 PM
#413
Posted 27 August 2010 - 09:23 PM
#414
Posted 10 November 2010 - 12:45 PM
And Suckerpunch looks awesome too! But that doesn't come out till next year damnit.
#415
Posted 10 November 2010 - 02:13 PM
#416
Posted 10 November 2010 - 03:46 PM
MissRhiRhi, on 10 November 2010 - 07:45 AM, said:
I'm still not sure about Suckerpunch. I love the idea that it seems to be a big love letter to geeks everywhere, and the premise of going into a fantasy world to escape reality is always fun (well, except for Pan's Labyrinth, which although a great film was also one of the most depressing things I've seen), but I'm kind of tired of the desaturated Sin City/300/Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow look to the movie. The fantasy world looks to be a cross between Japanese/Anime pop and Mignola/Del Toro fantasy, and I think a brighter color pallet would look better, but that's just my opinion. Plus, all of the CG makes me suspect that the action will be over the top, which can be entertaining, but it generally kills any sense of danger in the action since all laws of physics are warped for a cool visual so that logic gets tossed out the window. It's never a case of, "Holy crap! That beast just knocked her 50 feet in the air! It probably broke all of her ribs with that hit, and the rest of her is gonna be smashed when she falls 5 stories to the ground." Now it's a case of, "Whoa! That beast knocked her 50 feet in the air, but thanks to slow-mo she can do a series of flips and pull out double gigantic pistols to shoot that beast while she falls 5 stories (over the course of the next 30 seconds) to land in a cool pose and pause before the beast falls over and then explodes as she cooly walks away from the fireball, which never even singes her hair."
I think I've just gotten jaded with CG-driven action movies and much prefer the practical stunt work of a Bourne film and the incredible athleticism of an old-school Hong Kong or modern Thai martial arts flick. (Seriously, my jaw dropped more in amazement watching Ong Bak--no CG, no wirework, no stunt doubles--than any over-the-top CG-assisted action scene.) Oh, and for you Rhi, The Protector (another Tony Jaa flick) is set primarily in Australia, and it features an incredible 4-minute continuous fight scene--that's 4-minutes of fighting through a club filmed with one steadycam and not a single cut. That's not to say CG action is all bad--the action in Avatar, and CG flicks like How to Train Your Dragon and The Incredibles is great--but I prefer the action to be somewhat grounded in reality instead of kowtowing to a "cool" visual.
That said, if Suckerpunch has the ridiculous action I described before and embraces it as ridiculous instead of trying to pass it off as cool, it could be a heck of a lot of fun to watch.
And I'm still on the fence about Zack Snyder (director of Suckerpunch) directing the next Superman movie. He's proven that he can stay faithful to his source material, but Superman's wholesomeness is very different from anything he's handled in the past. I'm one of the few people who liked Superman Returns and saw all sorts of directions the series could've taken from there (heck, in chat one time, Bliss and I brainstormed a 2 movie arc following Returns that was pretty good, IMO, and it included a dramatic arc for Superman's--much hated--son), and I think Singer's idyllic, Rockwellian look to the movie (lifted from Donner's original) is much better suited to Superman than the slow-mo and graininess that Snyder seems to prefer.
#417
Posted 10 November 2010 - 04:22 PM
I'm gonna go look at cartoon boobies now
#419
Posted 10 November 2010 - 08:55 PM
JKR666, on 11 November 2010 - 04:43 AM, said:
I may see it only to listen to Daft Punk lol. Biggest selling point about that movie to me.
As for Suckerpunch. The costumes look cool and has entertaining effects, but I may give it a miss. I'm with Shapie these kinda films are over done lol.

Help


















